Sunday, September 30, 2012

Don't like your choices?

-->
Do you trust Mitt Romney's business sense to bring us back from the brink of economic disaster, but don't like his conservative views on abortion and gay rights?
Do you like Barack Obama's liberal social policies, but don't like his deliriously dangerous deficit spending?
Are you tired of seeing rabid crowds of protesters tear down and burn the American flag? Are you tired of giving foreign aid to countries where our ambassadors are murdered? Are you tired of Americans dying in Afghanistan?
Do you actually care about the U.S. Constitution?
Consider Gary Johnson, Libertarian candidate for President of the United States.
Johnson is to the right of Romney on economics, and to the left of Obama on social issues and foreign affairs.
Johnson would slash federal spending, shrink government, stop the wars, get the government out of the bedroom and the troops out of Afghanistan. He would allow military action only as provided under the Constitution. He would close some Mideast embassies and bring our officials home. He would concentrate on America's infrastructure, not nation building in foreign lands.
He would end the disastrous war on drugs (which has been as counter-productive as Prohibition in the 1920s) and push to legalize and control marijuana, just as alcohol is now controlled, crippling the drug cartels, ending the violence on the Mexican border, and diminishing illegal immigration.
Johnson is a fiscal conservative. He would abolish the IRS, the income tax, the payroll tax, the capital gains tax, the death tax, etc. etc. and replace it with the Fair Tax, which allows more freedom, because it taxes only what you spend, not what you earn. He would demand transparency from the Federal Reserve, and stop it from printing money willy-nilly, devaluing the U.S. dollar. Johnson would reassess the role of government, stop runaway spending, balance the budget now and stop government from interfering in areas where it has no business and no Constitutional authority.
He supports the Second Amendment rights of citizens to keep and bear arms.
ENERGY: Johnson would stop government subsidies to private enterprise, but encourage entrepreneurs to develop domestic energy sources under commonsense environmental regulations.
IMMIGRATION: Johnson would encourage legal immigration and a work visa for foreigners. He would support a two-year grace period for illegals to get work permits, and establish a path to citizenship for such individuals.
FOREIGN POLICY: No foreign nation building; no wars except as allowed under the Constitution. No torture; due process for detainees at Guantanamo.
HEALTH CARE: Repeal the health care reform law and allow the free market to provide health care. Reform Medicare and Medicaid. Federal assistance for those who cannot afford essential health care should be provided through simple block grants to the states, where innovation will create efficiencies and better care at less cost.
INTERNET: No federal regulation or taxation.
CIVIL LIBERTIES: Repeal the Patriot Act. Government must be neutral on personal beliefs. No restrictions on gay marriage.
ABORTION: Life is precious. A woman should have the right to make decisions up to the point of viability of the fetus.
EDUCATION: Turn education over to the local level. End the Department of Education.
If those ideas sound like something you could support, consider voting for Gary Johnson. Don't want to "waste" your vote? If enough citizens care about the Constitution, it could affect the future course of the nation, as the two major political parties will have to pay attention. Consider this quote from John Quincy Adams: "Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost."



Thursday, September 6, 2012

Clinton and the Pilgrims

In President Clinton's long defense of President Obama's failure to improve the economy, he sharply distilled the truth of today's political scene in one sentence: Democrats favor the state (Marx would call it the "collective"), while Republicans favor the individual.
Bravo, Mr. President! I have rarely heard a more succinct, accurate portrayal of the political landscape. Of course, Clinton used other words, but the meaning is the same. He said something like, "Republicans think it's every man for himself, whereas Democrats say we're all in this together."
Which idea works best?
Well, when the Pilgrims first landed at Plymouth Rock, they tried the "We're all in this together" approach. The fields were owned in common, and everyone worked the fields and shared in the harvest. Result? Starvation. Realizing their mistake, the Pilgrims allotted fields to individuals who worked their own land, harvested and marketed their own crops. Result? Plenty.